Questions for RFK Regarding Your Proposed Bitcoin Executive Orders 

“Transactional freedom [is] as important as freedom of expression under the 1st Amendment.”
~ Robert F. Kennedy, Jr

“The law? The law? I don’t have to obey the law. I report to a higher moral authority.”
~ Secretary Jack Kemp on why a HUD regional administrator could ignore a recent court decision regarding agency operations and finances

By Catherine Austin Fitts

At the Nashville Bitcoin conference last week, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. proposed that if elected, he would issue a series of executive orders to implement radical policies related to Bitcoin (BTC), U.S. taxation, and real estate investment. See video above and transcript of remarks here.

The Solari team has prepared a series of questions to help us understand what Kennedy and his advisors are proposing. We encourage our subscribers to post additional questions in the comment section and readers to repost and discuss on their forums.

Mr. Kennedy:

You propose moving assets from the Department of Justice (DOJ) Asset
Forfeiture Fund to the U.S. Treasury. If any of these seizures are
unjustified and therefore rightfully contested by BTC holders, what
will that do to the people who are trying to preserve their BTC? Will
such a precedent significantly increase the chances that aggressive
BTC seizures by over-eager prosecutors become easier in the future,
with no ability on the part of the honest BTC holder to stop seizure
other than by filing a complaint in court against the government?
Coinbase Custody serves as custodian for many of the largest
BTC ETFs. They also have the contract to serve as custodian for
BTC managed by the U.S. Marshals Service. Do you intend for the U.S.
Treasury to enter into a similar contract or will the New York Fed manage
the custodian service?
On what legal basis can a President move billions of assets from
DOJ to the U.S. Treasury without the consultation and approval of
the relevant Congressional appropriation (or other) committees?
Do you intend for any of the BTC you propose to be held by
Treasury to be held in the Exchange Stabilization Fund? Do you
intend for any of the Treasury BTC to be available to New York Fed
members to purchase for Bitcoin ETFs or other forms of collateral?
At current market prices, you are proposing that the U.S. Treasury
purchase $280 billion of BTC. You suggest, however, that this will
raise the market cap from the current $1.5 trillion to hundreds of
trillions of dollars so, presumably, the cost to taxpayers will be
much more. How do you intend to authorize such purchases based
on an executive order and without Congressional authorization,
appropriation, and oversight? Under this scenario, are you certain that
the crypto system is prepared to execute the 550 BTC per day
volume of transactions?
What funds will Treasury use to make the proposed BTC
purchases? Most Treasury funding comes from taxes paid by
individuals as well as from Treasury bonds sold to investors,
including U.S. pension funds and retirement accounts. Have you
calculated the market fees payable to BTC dealers in exchanging
dollars for BTC?
Current surveys suggest that no more than 20% of U.S. citizens
own BTC or crypto. Are you planning on using the taxes and
retirement savings of 100% of the everyday working citizenry to
create windfall profits for Bitcoin holders and the “Bitcoin
billionaires”? How does this fit with your views on the goal of
reducing economic inequality?
How much of the campaign donations you have raised to date
have come in the form of BTC and crypto? If you propose to take
actions that will raise the value of BTC by 100X or more, will that
“pump” the price of BTC before the election?
If you help increase the BTC price with your proposals that
benefit BTC investors, will that help you raise more donations from
grateful BTC holders?
Are BTC pump kickbacks an explicit funding strategy for your
campaign?
BTC currently uses approximately 1.17X the electricity used by
the Netherlands. What will your proposal do to the energy
consumption of BTC and other crypto? Where will the energy
come from? What will this do to energy prices paid by the American
people and global consumers? What will the environmental impact be?
How will your proposal that BTC-to-dollar transactions be non-
reportable and not taxable impact federal and state tax collections? What
will your proposal do to attract retail funds to purchase BTC and
leave real assets? Will this benefit the investors currently trying to
acquire and control real assets, such as farmland and water resources?
Your proposal that BTC become a “like kind asset” for purposes
of Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code—which would enable owners
of real estate to “exchange” real estate holdings for equal value of
BTC with no capital gains tax due—would greatly reduce U.S. income
tax revenues paid by large real estate investors and large Bitcoin holders, would it not? Doesn’t that mean that the common people will be paying more
taxes to make up for the shortfall? Does this means that the Bitcoin
“billionaires” will have tremendous power in the ongoing land grab
in America?
What is the justification for deregulating crypto transactions that
would otherwise be subject to SEC rules, when other non-crypto
transactions having similar characteristics are regulated in order to
protect investors from fraud and require material disclosure? How
will fraudulent crypto transactions be regulated, if at all?
How can you institute major, radical changes in U.S. tax policy by
executive order and without Congressional authorization? Is this
legal?
Given these proposals in combination, can’t the wealthy devise
strategies to stop paying U.S. taxes completely? Can large banks and
corporations reengineer their operations to operate with BTC to
avoid all taxes? By sheltering the rich and powerful from significant taxes, do
you intend to attract capital to the U.S. from global markets? What
will the impact be on countries in the emerging markets struggling in
U.S. dollar debt traps? Is this how your policy helps assure U.S. dollar
dominance?
When new laws and regulations are passed or adopted, the
American people typically have the opportunity to study and
comment. This does not happen with executive orders. Given the
potential impact on domestic and global inequality of tax burden,
financial wealth creation, and land and asset ownership, do you
feel the American people and their representatives should have the
opportunity to comment on these policy changes before they are adopted?
The Israeli Bitcoin community has been a leader in developing the global BTC market. What will be the impact of your proposals on Israel and its push to be a leader in dominance of the Internet? What will be the impact of large windfall profits on the Israeli and Zionist communities and other global clusters (for example, Switzerland) involved in early BTC development? Will your proposals be another example of using U.S. tax collections and retirement savings to fund benefits to Israel? How do your BTC proposals relate to your strong support of Israel and its Gaza genocide? How do they relate to the expansion of war currently underway in the Middle East?

Thank you for considering these questions. We look forward to your response.

Related Videos:

Related Reading:

Lummis and Kennedy’s Bitcoin Proposals Face Hurdle With 95,000 Bitcoin Owed to Bitfinex